Wednesday, September 29, 2021

The Hobbit, or There and Back Again by J.R.R. Tolkien - Book Review (No spoilers)


"In a hole in the ground there lived a hobbit. Not a nasty, dirty, wet hole, filled with the ends of worms and an oozy smell, nor yet a dry, bare, sandy hole with nothing in it to sit down on or to eat: it was a hobbit-hole, and that means comfort.

Written for J.R.R. Tolkien’s own children, The Hobbit met with instant critical acclaim when it was first published in 1937. Now recognized as a timeless classic, this introduction to the hobbit Bilbo Baggins, the wizard Gandalf, Gollum, and the spectacular world of Middle-earth recounts the adventures of a reluctant hero, a powerful and dangerous ring, and the cruel dragon Smaug the Magnificent."

I had thought about giving this book 3 stars because the plot wasn't bad, but I decided on giving it 2 stars. I skimmed through huge portions of it, and the descriptions of the forests were immensely repetitive. I found myself zoning out while reading about their journey, as it felt like the same thing over and over again. The book could have done well if it was a little shorter. The battle at the end was nice to read about, but it ended pretty quickly and then the rest of it was about the Hobbit's journey back home.

Writing - 3/5 : The writing style of the author is very rambling, and the book abounds in descriptions. He likes to twist sentences around and make them as long as possible. The story has a good flow, though. And please don't hate me for saying this, but this book felt like a Geronimo Stilton? A small creature going on an adventure, roaming strange lands with a group of others, and meeting new people. I guess I would have liked this book more if I had read it a few years ago.




I loved the songs in this book. They all rhymed and accompanied the story well. They made sense according to what was happening at that time and didn't seem forced. The illustrations in the book I read were great too. I want to watch the movie now, to see them all come to life.

Characters - 5/5 : All the characters were well developed. Although this is a prequel, we are given enough information to get an idea about everyone's behaviour. Bilbo had a constant personality throughout, and I agreed with his views about most things. Gandalf was interesting to read about as well and was a likeable character. Although there were many dwarves, each one of them had a separate personality. It was simple to differentiate them from each other by their dialogues and actions.




It was easy to grasp that the goblins were much larger than the dwarves, but their basic appearance sounded more or less the same. I could not picture how the elves were different from the goblins either, or how the dwarves were different from The Hobbit. Maybe it is just my bad imagination and years of assuming all of them look similar. But I would have liked it if we had gotten a little more description than that, since the author had plenty of pages to spare for describing the forests.

Pacing - 1/5 : I don't like giving this book such a low rating, but it was the pacing that spoilt everything for me. I absolutely could not get myself to care about how many trees were surrounding them, or how many streams they crossed each time they entered a new forest. Since the outcome of most scenarios was apparent, I was impatient for the end or a few twists along the way. There were so many dwarves, so I thought the author might kill some of them to make the story interesting. I didn't really want anyone to die, but I did want something unexpected or drastic to happen. 



Overall, though I liked the story, I'm going to have to give it 2 stars. I wish the author would have made it shorter or added a few plot twists along the way. I would recommend it for 8 to 12-year-olds, as older people are likely to get bored. 

Friday, September 24, 2021

The Spanish Love Deception by Elena Armas - Book Review (No spoilers)


~ The blurb I didn't bother putting in because it does not match the actual book ~

I have been cheated.

This book is a scam. Would I call it bad? No. House of Night was bad. The Twilight movies were bad. But this, this was so mind-numbing horrible that I have no words to describe its disgustingness. It promises us "an enemies-to-lovers, fake-dating romantic comedy. Perfect for those looking for a steamy slow-burn romance". Instead, it is a series of poorly executed, cringy clichĂ©s, with little to no plot or character development, and an unoriginal, expected climax. It was horrible. Wait, I already called it that. Then it was dreadful, horrifying, awful, terrible, appalling, hideous, ghastly, harrowing, gruesome, heinous, vile and loathsome.

It was so bad that it made my vocabulary run out, and I had to copy-paste words from Google.

No wonder I hated it, and here's more on why.



Characters - Okay, I will talk about them first, because the two main characters were basically the only thing this book had going on. That didn't work so much in its favour, since I hated both of them. Well technically, I hated their life choices, personalities and behaviour. But that's basically them.

I could not stand Lina at all. She had no personality except being a perky, obsessed-with-sweets Spanish person. In the author's effort to make her generic, she has gone so far as to say that the whole of Spain was filled with an "army" of Linas. One would assume this meant Miss Catalina Martin was a relatable, enjoyable book character who made sense to the reader. But well, she wasn't. Instead, we got a brainless manic whose only personality trait was grieving about her non-existent love-life and oOgLiNg her co-worker's broad chest and hard abs. Her family and all only seemed decent when they made fun of Lina, but that was not very often.

Aaron Blackford was...honestly I have no idea. All I gathered from Lina's shallow descriptions of him was that he was a blue-eyed mountain who kneaded people's body parts with a passion. And all the "drawing circles" with his thumb was pretty revolting. I will not get into all his animal attitude and creepy behaviour because it is not worth talking about. This guy just wasn't for me. I mean, he could be a gentleman and all, but he was super fixated on Lina and I can't see how he could have time to focus on anything but her. What's up with dwarfing all the furniture, dude? Also, 6'4" is tall, but not as tall as Aaron was made to sound; as if none of them had ever seen anyone that huge in their life. As if this happened to him every night-



Most reviews I read liked Lina's views about women in the workplace, and of course, I agree with them too, but I did not like how the author has portrayed Lina handling them. I cannot consider her a headstrong woman when all she does is run away from fights or let her large boyfriend handle them for her. I get that it was affecting her and she tried the best she could, but I could not count that as her victory because of the way she reacted.

Pacing - Maybe romances just aren't for me, but the beginning of this book was super slow. I am not used to reading 500-page contemporaries, and after reading this one I can see why they aren't written so long. When the only plot is two people falling in love, that can get boring fast. The first chapter was just Aaron offering to be Lina's date, and her saying no. The words "I don't need you" have been read by me more times in those ten minutes than they have in my entire life. After a few more chapters, I would have said this book was getting better, but only because of the drastically low standards set by the horrible first couple of chapters. I was still waiting for something consequential to happen. The whole thing to do with the man-auction could have been cut out entirely. I was bored when I was not even one-fourth of the way through.

Writing - Pardon my ignorance, but I thought the enemies-to-lovers trope indicates that the characters go from enemies to lovers. I was not aware that they had to go from secretly loving each other to openly loving each other. And where was the "comedy"? The "slow burn romance"? All I saw was two shallow people's shallow wuv for each other.

The book was also way too repetitive for mine- or anyone's- liking. Lina going on about Aaron's speshul blue eyes was very infuriating. Thirty pages in, and there were already more than twenty lines about the blueness of Aaron's eyes. His condescending and unfriendly manner was being overly mentioned too, to the extent that any word of his was being constituted as an insult directed at Lina. And his height. His stupid height. I didn't- and still don't- care if he was a million feet tall okay, just get on with the story. 

1 star for this book. I hated it so much that I would not wish it upon even my worst enemies. And hating it was made more depressing because of the pretty cover and the decent-sounding plot. 

What else is there to say? Just don't read this book. I mean-

















Thank you Anne Marie for the inspiring (and very editable) lyrics.

Monday, September 20, 2021

Origin : Robert Langdon #5 by Dan Brown - Book Review (No spoilers)


Summary-

"Robert Langdon, Harvard professor of symbology and religious iconology, arrives at the ultramodern Guggenheim Museum Bilbao to attend a major announcement—the unveiling of a discovery that “will change the face of science forever.” The evening’s host is Edmond Kirsch, a forty-year-old billionaire and futurist whose dazzling high-tech inventions and audacious predictions have made him a renowned global figure. Kirsch, who was one of Langdon’s first students at Harvard two decades earlier, is about to reveal an astonishing breakthrough . . . one that will answer two of the fundamental questions of human existence. As the event begins, Langdon and several hundred guests find themselves captivated by an utterly original presentation, which Langdon realizes will be far more controversial than he ever imagined. But the meticulously orchestrated evening suddenly erupts into chaos, and Kirsch’s precious discovery teeters on the brink of being lost forever. Reeling and facing an imminent threat, Langdon is forced into a desperate bid to escape Bilbao. With him is Ambra Vidal, the elegant museum director who worked with Kirsch to stage the provocative event. Together they flee to Barcelona on a perilous quest to locate a cryptic password that will unlock Kirsch’s secret. Navigating the dark corridors of hidden history and extreme religion, Langdon and Vidal must evade a tormented enemy whose all-knowing power seems to emanate from Spain’s Royal Palace itself . . . and who will stop at nothing to silence Edmond Kirsch. On a trail marked by modern art and enigmatic symbols, Langdon and Vidal uncover clues that ultimately bring them face-to-face with Kirsch’s shocking discovery . . . and the breathtaking truth that has long eluded us."

This was my first Dan Brown book, and I wasn't entirely dissatisfied with what I read. I am aware that I'm reading them out of order, but I only realised that once I had started reading. The plots do not intersect, only the characters, so it didn't matter. Three stars isn't a bad rating, but I did find some things that I disliked. The characters were too lost in the past, and there were many unnecessary scenes that could have been cut out. The book focused more on life in Spain and telling us facts about all the places than the actual story. One thing I did like, was that the chapters were all short, which encouraged me to read more as I could stop after reading virtually a couple more pages. Most of them ended on a slight cliff-hanger, which helped keep me engaged. More on all of this ahead.


“Well, science and religion are not competitors, they’re two different languages trying to tell the same story. There’s room in this world for both.”

I want to say "it's not the book, it's me" but isn't that the case with every book we dislike that someone else has loved? Origin wasn't bad, truly. The plot was interesting and the characters were decently developed. I just found the story very slow and dull to read. It took ages to pick up, and almost all of it was what we already knew from reading the blurb. True, there were a few twists to it at the end, but they were not as exciting as I had hoped. I had gone into this book thinking it would be a gripping crime mystery about two people travelling around the world searching for clues hidden in riddles about modern art. Instead, it was... this.

I did not feel invested in any of the character's lives. They were all dull old people with a strong sense of duty, bent on solving the problem at hand. All the main characters were shown to be famous, well established and intelligent people, which was a refreshing change, but I could not bring myself to like anyone much. Edmond was hardly in the book for me to form an opinion of him. Robert, his ex-teacher, was okay, but I didn't enjoy his chapters much. His claustrophobia was mentioned too many times and each chapter reminded us about how he felt uncomfortable in small spaces. Ambra more of an over-thinker than I would have liked a book character to be. She was painfully average when it came to most things, but that was not an issue. A lot of the reviews have also mentioned that all of Dan Brown's books have an "exotic beauty" in them, and this was no exception. Ambra Vidal was a beautiful Spanish... museum owner? Which somehow made her BFFs with the Edmond guy? I'm not sure how it worked, but her character seemed forced and unoriginal.

“There is only one way to triumph over death, and that is by making our lives masterpieces.”

Another thing I want to talk about is Robert's creepy behaviour towards Ambra. He took being a gentleman to a whole new level. I would have felt really uncomfortable if a stranger was being so friendly and getting into my space as much as Robert was. His questions seemed an invasion of her privacy. There was hardly any reason for them to get along so well, and I didn't get why they trusted each other so much. Not to mention all those "awkward" and "uncomfortably small" spaces they kept getting into, which clearly showed that the author intended to create some tension. There is also a line about Robert thinking about the "last time he had been this close to a woman in the back of a car", or something of that sort, which sounded really creepy to me. She was way younger than him, his student's friend, and already engaged besides. To top it off, they had met only a few hours ago. In the end of the book, when Ambra realises that her love can expand to accommodate another man besides her fiancé- uhm, I hope for their sakes that she means platonic love.

The ending was nicer than the rest of it. The plot did not develop much, and everything was what we already knew would happen. There was a little more action and finally, something seemed to happen in the last about eighty pages. When the killer was revealed, I was not very surprised, but it was fun to see the revelation unfold. It proved that Edmond's prediction of the future might not be as fun as it sounds. Robert's inhibitions felt more believable, and I liked how the author ended the book on that note to leave us to ponder the meanings.

I cannot say much about the character development, since I haven't read the other books. Robert's personality was easy to grasp though, so I would say the author did a good job. Ambra did not have many traits that stood out to me, but she was an independent woman, and that side of her appealed to me. The book was written from the point of view of many characters, but they got plenty of screen time since the book was long. It focused a lot on the character's lives apart from the actual plot. There were also many facts in the book and the author appeared very well informed. The extra information, however, made it a slight bother to read the book since it felt like too much work.

Coming to the scenes I felt were unnecessary. After Edmond's great announcement, there is a chapter from Valdespino's POV, where absolutely nothing happens. He only receives the news that the presentation has gone viral, and ponders what the other might be thinking of it. This is only one example that I remember, but plenty of Avila's chapters were repetitive too. Mentioning his past was required for the reader to understand him, but perhaps the information could have been shortened.

The author writes in such a way that we are not immediately told what the characters discover. He often gets back to it later in a roundabout way, and after a while, it got a bit annoying. When the characters found suspicious texts on a character's phone, we are not told what they say. If the author ever disclosed their contents, I do not remember. The author prolonged Edmond's announcement too much. I had been excited to read about it in the beginning, but by the end, it did not feel very special. I did not like the announcement very much either. I admit that I liked Edmond's style and stage presence, and he did make it very interesting. However, he only told us what we already knew, and his proof was a computer program.

“May our philosophies keep pace with our technologies. May our compassion keep pace with our powers. And may love, not fear, be the engine of change.”

The climax was dragged out, and I would have liked it if the author had ended the story quickly after the announcement was revealed. A few ends were left loose, and the rest was written off to be the killer's fault. The whole book was well-written though, and the author kept up the standard till the end. I would recommend reading the books in order if you want to try them out. They make sense separately too, and I do not think there are spoilers. So if you find the blurb of any middle book exciting- give it a try!

The Atlas Six : The Atlas #1 by Olivie Blake - Book Review (No spoilers)

Summary : The Alexandrian Society is the foremost secret society of magical academicians in the world. Each decade, only the six most unique...